Blogroll

Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Google. Show all posts

Thursday, 29 December 2011

Lets see how Google Use Quality Raters


There is been a lot of fearmongering discuss lately about Google’s individuals excellent raters and just exactly what they are used for and how their scores are used internal at Look for engines. Conversation was managing widespread at Pubcon where I experienced several SEOs bbq grill He Cutts about the subject, and seems to have propagate like htc wildfire mobile phone across the dunia ngeblog in the last 30 days or two. I’d like to add my take – particularly that we should not anxiety about this at all but rather use what we’ve acquired to our benefits.

So who am I to discuss this?

Well, in the attention of complete disclosure: I used to be a excellent rater rear again around 2005ish. Since I finalized an NDA way rear again when and I’m not sure if it’s ended or not (I believe it is, but I can not discover a copy) I’m going to create sure everything I discuss can be discovered (or quickly came at) with a Look for. Moreover, you should reverence anything I say as a “theory” and not real “truth.” The views herein are my own and not those of Look for engines or anybody else blah blah blah appropriate products we must get rear again on subject.

Quality raters are definitely not a new element at all. They have been around for a long time and have probably been engaged in every significant criteria upgrade since California (and who knows I’ve even observed speculation that Look for engines used loved ones as raters before they used t emps.) Look for engines usually content the work on their own web page (I only see ppc rater opportunities currently but look. Moreover you used to be able to utilize by delivering an e-mail with subject “Quality Rater” to temporaryjobs@google.com – not sure if that still is applicable.)
The factor is, Look for engines has been using excellent raters for a long time. They log into a program known as EWOQ and execute a wide range of report duties. Some of those duties are as easy as being given a web page and a question and report it as Important, Useful, Appropriate, Not Appropriate, Trash, Lean Internet marketer, Adult movie, etc.

Other duties include looking at several google models for a question and identifying which set was better overall. (note: Overall indicates they look at ALL the websites in the outcome set, so a list with 7 useful 1 vital 1 related and 1 spam may be better than one with 8 useful and 2 non-relevant results) See how confusing that gets? That is why they need LOTS of information.

And LOTS is exactly the factor. Look for engines is certainly not using these raters to banner your web page. He Cutts already destroyed it – just as he did in individual at Pubcon when some well-known SEOs faced him at the equipment.

We do not need to take Matt’s term for it though, we just need to understand that using excellent raters to target websites is merely not effective and scalable enough to utilize to the complete web. Actually, whenever you have a idea about Look for engines, asking “is this effective and scalable?” is a excellent way to discover out if they are really doing it. The principles of effective and scalable are HUGE within Look for engines. Seriously, they use them in almost every obvious plan and scholarly document they post. It’s just how pc experts think.

So how are they (most likely) using excellent raters?

My best think (and what He referred to on Twitter) is that they are using the excellent raters to assess criteria changes – and that they are doing it in several different techniques. Examining the excellent of an criteria is a rather challenging idea. One way is to put it stay for a choose individuals and then look at their press through charges, how often they improve their search, etc. But what if that criteria modify only utilized to a amount or a certain form of question – would you get a excellent enough example size?

I strongly believe that example dimension is at the center of the Look for engines excellent rater plan. Not only for guaranteeing that the appropriate kinds of concerns are used as an criteria energy indication, but also for developing a appropriate example dimension useful, related, and spam websites. Once they have that example, they can then begin managing more innovative computerized research of the methods – against whatever process they are trying to evaluate.

I use the term “task” because I’m sure if we had accessibility we’d see that there can be some kind of sensation problems program form criteria associated with the individuals raters as well – mostly because their feedback seems to fit with the whole “learning paradigm” design of sensation problems netting.

Given that, it did not add up for Look for engines to use the information on a web page by web page time frame. Not only is it not effective and scalable, but it does not add up to combat spam personally. They would overlook way too much – plus, it would quickly become infected in the same way that the Start Index Venture did.

So what can I learn?

The greatest downside for SEOs does not have anything to do with the truth that Look for engines uses excellent raters or even how Look for engines uses them. The greatest possibility is in comprehension the descriptions of Important, Useful, Appropriate, Not Releavnt, Trash, and Lean Internet marketer included within the published excellent rater guideline. Instead of asking “can a individuals rater target me?” ask yourself “will a individuals user checking out Look for engines perspective my web page as useful? Why? If not, what can I do to create sure it’s seen as useful?” (note to self: do a followup document on useful.) Look at the description of slim affiliate and create sure your web page is certainly not near to that. Do the same element with the description of spam.

Don’t do it because of the raters though, they are just report the criteria to see if it’s doing additionally meant. Do it because Look for engines has informed us that they want to demonstrate websites that fit the useful account and not present spam or slim associates in their google search. Concentrating less on the “how” and more on the “why” will help keep you before bend on criteria changes while assisting create your SEO initiatives more maintainable.


Tuesday, 27 December 2011

Google welcoming 2012

Google Google Google - Now a days more then half of the world depends upon Google.com.

To know anything from needle to spaceship all will search on the Google. Google is like a family member to us. From more then a decade Google is improving search results and providing us the best and appropriate search results we wanted or we needed. Every year Google gives us surprises we never expected and after looking and optimizing that we are happy.

Long Live Google we Expect more from you. 


Friday, 25 November 2011

Google Changes Algorithm To Promote "Fresh and New" Results


In 2007, Google first discussed a portion of the algorithm is known as the query "deserves freshness" or "QDF". ​​QDF portion of the algorithm, which operates for the analysis, a been active in the past to search queries, such as sports scores, news, natural disasters, epidemics, seasonal festivals, live events, and other similar types of search queries. For example, " Upcoming concerts of the "if a search query that includes the Google search results should not include concerts last year. The new algorithm change designed to better understand the intent of the researcher and applying a formula similar to "QDF" on a large scale affecting more search queries.

While the latest algorithm change skeptics concerned that Google displays relevant rather less "fresh" content rather than an ancient authoritative page, Google is aware of this possibility. Google announced that they understand that different search queries will require varying degrees of "freshness" based on the intention of a researcher.

Because Google's results have exceeded the search queries that many users are on Facebook and Twitter become more relevant for "fresh" the results. Google hopes to change that this new algorithm allows users to information they want in a timely manner and avoid losing traffic to competition social media.


Thursday, 24 November 2011

Lego Robots and Teen Investors visit to Google


He made his way down the field, finds its target, the target can do so before time runs out? 





No, it's a sports game, but to see a robot made with Lego bricks, and built and programmed by a team of young students will participate in the early ® LEGO ® League (FLL) robotics tournament. On Saturday, November 19th marked our sixth year of holding a qualifying tournament at the headquarters of Google. This year, 16 teams of Bay Area 9-14 years participated, giving energy to our school with enthusiasm and even a spontaneous conga line or two.



I am a computer engineer with a longstanding interest in LEGO robotics staff and, more importantly, for the children excited about doing science and technology. When fellow Google engineer Albert Bodenhamer and learned of the event for some time, we have assembled a team of volunteers from Google, has been in contact with the regional coordinators FLL-profit group learning and celebrate our first tournament game . Now we host the event each year, with a staff of 25 to 30 users of Google, spouses and friends who spend the day volunteering as judges and referees and help with all the setup and logistics.

Center of the action during the day of the tournament was two sizes of table tennis tables with these bare-legged robots competed against the clock to complete a series of physical activities, all related to the issue of food safety tournament. Small tables covered with "props" by robots. For example, at one point, the robots were scoop, carry and empty plastic distributors of "bacteria" in a plastic basin in miniature on the opposite side of the table. Referees in striped shirt and black-white and started and stopped the clock and keep your eyes off the penalties, the MC gave play-by-play action. At the same time, parents and coaches crowded around, cheering and taking pictures, and the action was sent to the screen for all to see Jumbo.

When not competing at the tables, he met with three different judges. One of the jurors asked the students their robots (as designed, how it worked), while another group was asked on the baseline values ​​(how they worked together as a team, learning, scholarship). The third front of the judges, the teams presented their research projects and answered questions. Research, while related to robotics, seeks to integrate research and problem-solving success factors of any real-world design team in the competition.

At the end of the day it announced rewards. Bites and Bytes team won the basic values, Droids Decon won the award for best research project won Xtreme designers to design the robot and Cyborgs Cougar Flight won for the performance of the robot. LegoNauts won the Champion. Seven teams advanced to the championship of the district, to be held in Redwood City, California in January. Finally, the tournament came to national and international level.

It’s important, not to mention fun, to support creative outlets for young people to get involved in computer science and technology. Competitions like FLL introduce a whole new generation to the world of technology and engineering, and it’s always a blast to support the students who are participating—even if I am a bit exhausted after that conga line. 


Wednesday, 23 November 2011

What you need to know about Google Round Up news


Google has recently made many changes when it comes to new research. For those who rely heavily on traffic from Google News, you know that a change in the algorithm or a technical problem with indexing can make or break your month. Some recent updates can however give you a place on the competition, if used properly. These changes seem to have shaken the research, but in my opinion could potentially help publishers and individual bloggers out considerably. Let us consider newest and best.

Tags Outstanding 


Last month, Google announced a new label that will allow content publishers to give and get credit where credit is due. By placing the "outstanding" HTML tag in the header of an article, you can get this item marked as "outstanding" on the front page of Google News News results of the search.

What is interesting is how the use of the content tag is recommended. He was invited to mark your own content as "hors concours", but not more than 7 times a week. This is to ensure that publishers do not abuse the roof. But recognizing the content of other publishers with the tag out of competition (when you link from your own news article, for example), there is no limit to how many items that can be felt.

This means that Google is encouraging publishers to reward great content, and therefore, is likely to get better visibility in Google News itself. Referring to and recognizes the high quality of content is just one way that Google's algorithms can determine the overall quality of their content.

The main challenge with this label comes with the application. When working in a large organization may have dozens of contributors, will be a task in itself for the editors to work on the content production process. Moreover, depending on your CMS can not be a quick and easy. I have curiosity to hear comments on whether the implementation has been a problem until now.


Author Of The Information In The Search Results 


As it seems, Google is currently testing the display of author information in the search results. The purpose of this function is to better identify the authors, giving them the opportunity to have the most clearly visible and give your readers more information about any other content that the author wrote in the past.

To make this possible, the process is fairly simple. You must create a Google profile, with a blow to the head of good quality at your profile picture. So you can check the author of the linked content using two different methods mentioned in this article help.

It 's funny to me that Google is basically dangling the carrot better visibility on search engines in the face of the authors, only if you create a Google profile. This is what catches have yet to be seen, however, individuals who wish to establish a definite advantage.


Personalization

Google News offers a variety of ways, which allows readers to edit the news experience based on personal interests. This can be done by adjusting the position using the history of the network is adjusted automatically for you, with certain types of interest, and more. What I'm curious to know how to customize has been particularly affected by the editors. For example, if I do not think of myself as a fan of technology that would not have had to add this class will update the latest news. However, I could actually be really interested in the latest update iPhone because I'm buying a new phone. So there are some publishers losing? Not sure, but once again interested in learning how this may or may not be affected by network traffic.

All in all, it's worth it in tune with the changes to Google News has put in place and continue to do so in the coming months. These updates affect both large and small publishers, bloggers and individual contributors as well as personal use of the individual. I am excited about the next great education, whatever it is.







Twitter Delicious Facebook Digg Favorites More